unify packages & upgrades #107

Merged
twenty-panda merged 8 commits from refs/pull/107/head into main 2024-04-27 08:53:41 +00:00
twenty-panda commented 2024-03-15 05:33:54 +00:00 (Migrated from code.forgejo.org)

packages must also be tested for upgrades, they need the same range of Forgejo versions to test against. Group them together instead of keeping them appart.

packages must also be tested for upgrades, they need the same range of Forgejo versions to test against. Group them together instead of keeping them appart.
earl-warren (Migrated from code.forgejo.org) reviewed 2024-03-15 12:48:42 +00:00
earl-warren (Migrated from code.forgejo.org) left a comment

Much needed refactor. The initial implementation of the package tests should have gone this way from the start: it duplicated way too much.

Much needed refactor. The initial implementation of the package tests should have gone this way from the start: it duplicated way too much.
earl-warren (Migrated from code.forgejo.org) commented 2024-03-15 12:48:42 +00:00

Is it really necessary for this lib.sh to be executable? I don't see why.

Is it really necessary for this lib.sh to be executable? I don't see why.
earl-warren commented 2024-03-15 12:51:28 +00:00 (Migrated from code.forgejo.org)

I do not think enable cgo is necessary, it should be implicitly set, not explicitly.

I do not think enable cgo is necessary, it should be implicitly set, not explicitly.
earl-warren (Migrated from code.forgejo.org) approved these changes 2024-03-15 13:14:10 +00:00
earl-warren commented 2024-03-15 13:14:52 +00:00 (Migrated from code.forgejo.org)

It would be great to update the forgejo-pr branch next.

It would be great to update the `forgejo-pr` branch next.
twenty-panda commented 2024-03-17 09:09:52 +00:00 (Migrated from code.forgejo.org)

I do not think enable cgo is necessary, it should be implicitly set, not explicitly.

removed

> I do not think enable cgo is necessary, it should be implicitly set, not explicitly. removed
twenty-panda commented 2024-03-17 09:15:23 +00:00 (Migrated from code.forgejo.org)

It would be great to update the forgejo-pr branch next.

https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/104 is where I'll work on that.

> It would be great to update the `forgejo-pr` branch next. https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/end-to-end/pulls/104 is where I'll work on that.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No reviewers
No labels
l1
l2
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: earl-warren/end-to-end#107
No description provided.